How the city of Milpitas overcharges parcels on sewage.
Shown here is a table from the city general plan chapter 7 Table III.29 page 7-45 that shows how many people live in their parcels in Milpitas.
http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/plan_plan_general_chapter7.pdf on page 7-45.
household size | % of all households | total | renters | owners |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 person | 11.5% | 2,066 | 702 | 1,364 |
2 persons | 24.0% | 4,290 | 1,123 | 3,167 |
3 persons | 20.3% | 3,634 | 1,249 | 2,385 |
4 persons | 20.0% | 3,584 | 1,048 | 2,538 |
5 persons | 11.4% | 2,048 | 2048 | 1,362 |
6 persons | 6.3% | 1,120 | 252 | 868 |
7 persons | 6.5% | 1,157 | 361 | 796 |
5 or more persons | 24.2% | 4,325 | 1,309 | 3,016 |
In order to calculate a fee per parcel the city uses a persons per household number (PPH). the 2010 numbers are the following: For single family units is 3.45, multifamily units 2.75 and mobile homes 1.9 . The city changed these numbers and decided to use the 2010 sewage report numbers. The 2010 sewage numbers are from a Santa Clara planning department for the year 1975. The 1975 numbers are as follows: Single family 3.37, multifamily 2.05 and mobile home PPH numbers are the same as today. The city is assuming every parcel is using 60-65 gallons a day per person for 365 days a year. If you do not use that may gallons of water a day, well then your overcharged in the gallons also. You may ask why did the city change from one set of persons per household numbers to other? The answer is that if they used the 2010 numbers the single family units could not be charged a 7% increase in fees in 2011 and the multifamily charges would go up by 3%, but if they used the 1975 numbers that really decreases the number people per household for multifamily parcels which will result in a decrease in the number gallons the multifamily parcels are using by 25%. So the multifamily units sewage fee should have gone down, but went up by 0.75% and single family units went up by 7%. The city is playing politics with the fees and overcharging the single family units. If the city just used the current person per household (PPH) numbers i.e. single family 3.45 multifamily 2.75 and mobile homes 1.9 PPH, then the single family parcels would have payed only $0.78 more per year. This is not a misprint. The multifamily parcels would have payed only $9.60 more a year. Using the 1975 Santa Clara city planning numbers i.e. single family 3.37and multifamily 2.05 PPH, then the city could charge $30.00 more for single family units or 7% more then the $425.64 charge in 2010. Single family units now pay $149.00 more per year then multifamily units. This is a simple trick to overcharge the single family units.
Looking at the table above for all the single, multifamily or mobile homes parcels there are 1,364 parcels that only have one person living in them and are being grossly overcharged. Depending on what type of housing units their in, they are charged 2-3 times what they should be paying. There are 3,167 households that only have 2 people living in them. Of the 3,167 households that have 2 people there are 2,831 single family units that are overcharged because again you charging as if there were 3.37- 3.45 PPH. This means that just in the single family units alone there are over 2,977 households that are overcharged. That is 36.31% of all the single family units are being overcharged because of 2 or less people living in them.
How would you solve this problem? The answer is by charging for what you really use. The city of Milpitas does exactly that for business units but not for residential units. A fee per HCF would save all those households from being grossly overcharged. If you look at the number of households that have 4 or more people per household (PPH) then there are 5,564 parcels that are undercharged because you’re only charging as if there were 3.37 PPH to 3.45 PPH using 60 - 65 gallons a day, 365 days a year. That means that 44.58% are being undercharged. This problem would go away if you were charged a fee per HCF. Everyone would pay their fair share. The city says that the fee per HCF would not be accurate in all cases but how accurate is overcharging over 36% of single family residents and undercharging 44.58% of all residents. The city is not even in the ball park for accuracy using the flat rate fees as the statistics show.
No comments:
Post a Comment